Skip to main content

Darwinism Versus the Octopus: An Evolutionary Dilemma

By
Description: The presence of similar complex structures in unrelated creatures poses a great dilemma for evolutionists.
What’s the difference between evolutionary theory and an octopus? Well, one is a slippery, color-changing escape artist that can get out of any tough situation and the other is an aquatic invertebrate.
But seriously.  One of the biggest problems for neo-Darwinists is the origin of complex structures that appear suddenly in nature or the fossil record.  My friend Dr.  Stephen Meyer talks about this in his wonderful book, "Darwin’s Doubt." He points out how, in the so-called "Cambrian Explosion," the majority of animal phyla on earth appeared suddenly, and without obvious ancestry—almost as if they "exploded" onto the scene out of nowhere.
But for evolutionary biologists who adhere to strict naturalism, living animals pose an even greater problem: Things like powered flight, the so-called "camera eye," and advanced brains defy reduction.  That is, they’re so complex that you can’t make them simpler without breaking them.  Yet scientists tell us that many of these structures arose by themselves not once, but many times! And here is where the octopus comes in.
A study published in the journal "Nature" describes how researchers sequenced the octopus genome and found something surprising.  Compared with other invertebrates, the DNA of the octopus was "alien": nothing like the genetic codes of what they thought were similar animals, like clams and sea snails.
Now, octopi aren’t from another planet, but they are, figuratively speaking, out-of-this-world.  They can change color and texture, they use ink to make a quick getaway, and they’re shockingly clever.  They can unscrew jar lids and squeeze their soft bodies through just about any opening.One nineteenth century naturalist tells of an octopus climbing out of its tank, ambling across the room to a neighboring tank, and gorging itself on fish before returning home!
The key to this uncanny intelligence is the octopus’ so-called "alien" nervous system, brain, and eyes.  But these features are not alien to the animal kingdom at all.  In fact, they’re quite common in higher vertebrates.  The octopus genome shares key similarities with ours, including the development of high-powered brains and "camera eyes" with a cornea, lens, and retina.
Now here’s the problem for evolution: according to Neo-Darwinists, we’re not related to octopi—at least not within the last several hundred million years.  That means all of these genes, complex structures, and incredible capabilities came about twice.
The researchers who sequenced the octopus genome call this "a striking example of convergent evolution," or the supposed tendency of unrelated creatures to develop the same traits in response to environmental pressures.  Isn’t that just a fancy way of saying a miracle happened twice?
But the octopus isn’t the only such miracle.  "Convergent evolution" is all over nature, from powered flight evolving three times to each continent having its own version of the anteater.  Think about that.  As one delightfully un-self-conscious "Science Today" cover put it, convergent evolution is "nature discover[ing] the same design over and over." Well, good for nature!
But as Luskin argues, there’s a better explanation for a tentacled mollusk having a mammal’s brain and human eyes.  And that explanation is common design by an intelligent Engineer.  And like all good engineers, this this one reused some of His best designs.
Now that explanation isn’t going to satisfy Darwinian naturalists.  And they’ll probably keep on invoking "convergent evolution" when faced with impossible coincidences in nature.
But hopefully knowing a more straightforward explanation leaves you forearmed—or should I said "eight-armed"?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

King Saud Mosque, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

By
During the 1980's, the Egyptian architect Abdel Wahed El-Wakil designed over a dozen mosques in Saudi Arabia. While these mosques differ in size, formal composition, and sources of financing, they nonetheless are umted by a number of general characteristics. Firstly, they can all be referred to as revivalist structures. All draw heavily, and often very directly, on various historical prototypes belonging to the architectural heritage of the Islamic world. All these mosques share strong similarities in the use of materials and construction technologies Their construction is based on the utilisation of load bearing brick walls, vaults and domes. Therefore, these structures are built of hollow baked bricks held together with mortar Most of the brick surfaces are covered with white plaster, and in some cases, with granite. However, the interior of the vaults and domes are generally left exposed, and are only coated with a layer of browinsh paint. As for reinforced concrete, its use i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jama Masjid of Herat Afghanistan

By
The Jama Masjid of Herat (مسجد جمعه هرات), also known as the Masjid-i Jami' of Herat, and the Great Mosque of Herat[1] is a mosque in the city of Herat, in the Herat Province of north-western Afghanistan. It was built by Ghurids, the famous Sultan Ghayas-ud-Din Ghori, who laid its foundation in 1200 AD, and later extended by several rulers as Herat changed rulers down the centuries from the Timurids, to the Safavids, to the Mughals and the Uzbeks, all of whom supported the mosque. Though many of the glazed tiles have been replaced during subsequent periods, the Great Mosque in Herat was given its present form during the closing years of the fifteenth century. Apart from numerous small neighborhood mosques for daily prayer, most communities in the Islamic world have a larger mosque, a congregational mosque for Friday services with a sermon. The Jama Masjid was not always the largest mosque in Herat; a much larger complex the Mosque and Madressa of Gawharshad, also built by the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jama Mosque, Mumbai

By
Overview Jama Masjid ("Friday Mosque") in South Mumbai near Crawford Market, is the largest and oldest mosque in the city. It is said that the Jama Masjid was firstly situated somewhere near to the Crawford market. In 1770, the mosque was destroyed by Governor William Hornby.  The Masjid is a quadrangular building of brick and stone encircled by a ring of terraced roofed and double storied buildings. The main eastern gate leads to an ancient tank filled with about 10 feet of water. From the depths of the tank rise 16 black stone arches which support the whole of the mosque.  The Structure of the present Jama Masjid statred in 1775 ans the building was all standing in year 1802. The masjid lies on the quadrangular piles made up of brick and stone, this is a double storied building. The gate on the eastern side lands near the ancient tank of water. Introduction The  Jama Masjid  is a mosque in the Kalbadevi neighborhood, near Craw...
1 comment
Read more